Hurry Hurry, buy your EV metals before the world runs out of them

I couldn’t help but notice that Eramet and Glencore in their 2017 financials couldn’t say enough about metals in the electric vehicle (EV) market. All of a sudden, well not so sudden in Glencore’s case, the metals world has a new HOT concept to sell, metals to the EVs. Whether it is cobalt, tied with lithium, as the two sizzling commodities, or nickel or manganese or you name it.

If you add EV to your presentation, investors, the companies’ boards, and the financial analysts will fall all over you. It’s the fifty-year supercycle without China or even India. And, it makes the rare earth craze of a few years ago passé.

Being the contrarian that I am, let’s look at it with a more candid eye. GM sold about 3.1-million cars in the US last year, while Ford sold another 2.6-million units. And, SUV sales by all manufacturers were around 7-million units. Total US car sales were over 15-million units last year.

Tesla, the darling of Wall Street, sold about 101,000 cars. EVs around the world account for about 1.5% of sales. Of course the percentage growth of EVs is staggering, but consider you are starting for around zero.

Many developed countries, including China, are saying that the internal combustion engine is doomed and won’t be around much longer. They are issuing all sort of mandates and edicts about the future. It’s as if buyers don’t have a say in this—they don’t.

Also, despite what many people say, EVs depend on government subsidies and the more EVs, the higher the bill. Also, by putting the drop dead date far enough into the future, today’s leaders don’t have to worry since they won’t be around to blame.

Also, current EVs still have a limited range and take a long time to recharge. And, several million gas stations will have to be replaced with charging systems. My neighbor has a very expensive Tesla, which I always say is the safest car since it never leaves the driveway.

My problem, however, isn’t that EVs will eventually be a major propulsion source for cars, but that the technology is EVOLVING. The trouble with predicting the future is that it is based on today’s knowledge. Computers are getting quicker with more storage with less materials. The number of cars, whether they are EVs or gas powered, could substantially drop in a shared economy world.

The internal combustion engine has over 150 years of development. It keeps getting better with more power, uses less fuel and has less emissions. It’s going to be that way with EVs. The energy storage systems of today will be the Univac computers of the 1950s.

That means we shouldn’t invest in EVs, but the investment should be in technology, not metals that could be used in future EVs. It’s the build it and they will come mentality.

As my good friend told me (in Italian) a good lie is better than a bad truth.

Leave a Reply

2 Comment threads
4 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
Chee Heng KingKevin FowkesalanpatrickryanAlex Andreev Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Notify of
Alex Andreev
Alex Andreev

Never could say better on all of these issues, Patrick! Thanks for such a sober view

Kevin Fowkes
Kevin Fowkes

Governments also haven’t stopped to think where the huge extra amount of electricity is going to come from if the internal combustion engine is to be eliminated from cars. We are a good example here in the UK. All coal fired power stations here have to be closed by 2025 and most have already gone. Nuclear is ruinously expensive, environmentally controversial and takes decades to build. We are not known for our sunshine, making solar pretty useless here. A few extra windmills are not going to be able to power cars for a population of 67 million. If this really… Read more »

Chee Heng King
Chee Heng King

Hi, is Kevin Fowkes the one who is doing the presentation slides on ferroalloys that you can find throughout the internet?

Love your analysis.